1 In terms of your own future use, which 'body ' of information (ie. the original 'snapshot' of the site, or your own, annotated, analytical version) would be most useful to refer back to?
My annotated reference provides more information about the site and its usefulness. It provides a basic analysis of what content is available on the site, and also lets me know that the site is from a reliable source. It also explains that the site was created for someone elses use, so therefore allows me to understand whether the information is useful for my needs.
2. In term of external users (i.e. if you included this site as a hyperlink or resource on a website) which body of information would best help them judge if the site was useful or of interest to them?
The introduction to the information provided on the site, and the hyperlinks created at the top of the page allows the user to know what is on the site without having to scroll to see each individual heading. Therefore this information is the best in the body of the website for an external user to know if the site is useful for their needs.
About Me
- paulnichols
- I am a 22 year old country boy, who has moved back here after spending 3 years in the big smoke. I am currently studying part-time and working full-time. AND also am in the position to purchase my first property
No comments:
Post a Comment